Big Head Press

L. Neil Smith's
Number 721, May 19, 2013

"I think we may have reached a point, elected a
President, who _possesses_ no individuality, no
real being of his own, but is made up totally
of the collective. Something like the Borg Queen."

Previous Previous Table of Contents Contents Next Next

Letters to the Editor

Bookmark and Share

Send Letters to
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication

[Letters to the editor are welcome on any and all subjects. Sign your letter in the text body with your name and e-mail address as you wish them to appear, otherwise we will use the information in the "From:" header!]

Catch-484 (22 squared)

Heller sure coined a term with his book, Catch-22...

A good friend of mine sent along this example of Heller's "Catch-22" phrase-slash-book title:

Here is an example of Catch 22 , squared.

We won't tell you how we got the info, because then you might have a chance at trying the method we got the info with in a court. Therefore, because we will not tell you, you cannot go to court.

Neener neener neener!

I have no sympathy for indiscriminate blowers-uppers of innocents and property (nor discriminate blowers-uppers, for that matter), yet the authoritarian fan-dance on display here, just to stay out of court, thereby preserving the technique with which to abuse others—you?, me?—is ridiculousness of the first water.

Ted Ball

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

payment type

Re: "The World's Greatest Propaganda Ministry" by Jeff Ganaposki

I think Jeff is still confused. Of course democracies can be either direct or indirect. And "republic" just means "not a monarchy". And representation is a bogus idea, as (apparently) is a constitution.

I can't see why people get wound up about these definitions. This country is clearly an oligarchy dressed up as a democratic (that is, there are elections) representative (we elect scumbags to rule us) republic (it's not a monarchy—yet).

Whatever words a person prefers between "republic" or "democracy", neither one has anything to do with liberty. As to the best form of government, the correct answer is "none".

Actually now that I think of it, since a republic is defined by what it is not, a country that is an anarchy could also be called a republic. "The Anarchist Republic of America", sounds good. But the USSR was also a legitimate republic so I wouldn't get too excited about republics...

Paul Bonneau

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

payment type

Big Head Press