THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 504, February 1, 2009
"Their dream is the impossible one, as
they must Control 300 million Americans"
Send Letters to email@example.com
To the Editor:
Obama has all of the tools necessary to implemenet his vision of a "Brave New World" Orderwatch this:
Also, click on www.infowars.com for more truly frightening information!
Re: "Reality Check" by A.X. Perez
In "Reality Check" I made the statement "The difference between bad and worse is less than the difference between good and bad." I obviously meant "the difference between bad and worse is greater than the difference between good and bad." Healthy is good. A viral infection with a fever of just under 104 degrees is bad. Developing pneumonia as a secondary infection from said illness is worse. We already got the flu, the trick is to keep it from turning into pneumonia.
Meanwhile my buddy (or alternate personality) Crazy Al has heard my
confession and assigned me to read
in a Strange Land
again as penance. By the way I have turned my students on to
Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. Let's see if my bosses offer me hemlock.
is one of the standards where I teach.
Re: "Taxes, Statism, Authority and Anal rape. Or Three Weddings and a Funeral?" by David Earnest
Okay, fess up: How is it that you "saw" the connivance in "Y2K," but completely missed the contrivance of the "Dot.Bomb?"
Enquiring minds want to know!
Today is Superbowl Sunday. Most Americans are more concerned today about the point spread than gun control. Tomorrow they will be more concerned about making the rent or mortgage than having their Email snooped by the FBI. They will be more worried over traffic congestion than how excessive taxes are affecting the price of gas.
This is as it should be. People should be too busy being free to think about it. Of course, some of us enjoy studying on freedom and reading and writing about it. And we should be able to do that too.
Then there are those gits who are spending today thinking about how to impose gun control, snoop Email, raise taxes and censoring what the rest of read and write. Guess it gripes them we are having fun. May they be as far from having achieved their goals next year as this, preferably further.
Barack Husein Obama seeks to silemnce all dissent
To the Editor:
In earlier letters dated 09/12/2008 & 11/28/2008, I warned that President Barack Hussein Obama (bin-Laden?) would try to crush public dissent by going after talk-radio shows, and quite possibly, the Internet, as well. Tragically, the first part of my prediction is coming to pass. In a WorldNetDaily.com article headlined "White House plan puts bull's-eye on talk shows", Barack Hussein Obama's (bin-Laden?) clear threat: "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done." was quotedand he means it.
Barack Hussein Obama (bin-Laden?) and his counterpartsSaul Alinsky, Raul and Fidel Castro, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Jimmy Hoffa, just to mention a few corrupt thugs who attained positions of powerall seek to silence oppositionsome with Gestapo and KGB secret police, others with turbas divinas divine mobs), "dignity battalions', Guardia Civils or whatever else they name their sturmtruppen. (Civilian Security Forces, too?).
This is just the beginning, folks. May God have mercy on us all. (Oh, I think I just violated another sacred canon of the Politically CorrectI mentioned God.)
After careful study of the facts and even more carefully thinking out the implications of what I'm about to write I have concluded that there are circumstances in which it is ethical and moral to deny someone weapons. These are all variations of the theme that the person in question wishes to use these weapons specifically to violate the rights of others, not to defend his own rights.
This is a decision that can only be made by the person giving or selling the weapons in question. No one can or should be denied the responsibility of making this decision. Please note that this is not a denial of the would be buyer's right to be armed as an enforcement of the vendor or donor's right to dispose of his property in a manner he feels is morally responsible. No congress, court or government agency can change this.
This is quite appropriate. The fact is that too many legislators, judges and government agents are people whose custom I would feel morally bound to refuse if I was selling weapons.
Especially most advocates of gun control and the police who delight in enforcing their will.
New libertarian Meetup group
I am sending this to all the liberty lovers in my contact list. Does that make me guilty of "spamming"?
Just in case you know of anyone in the Clovis, New Mexico area
who would be interested in a libertarian Meetup group, I present:
Help Support TLE by patronizing our advertisers and affiliates.
We cheerfully accept donations!